| 000 | 01954nam a22002897a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20240918135209.0 | ||
| 008 | 240918b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a0022-0671 | ||
| 040 | _cDSSC | ||
| 082 | _aPer/371.102/T179/2016 | ||
| 100 |
_aTarchi, Christian _911519 |
||
| 130 |
_aThe Journal of Educational Research _911399 |
||
| 245 |
_aReciprocal teaching: Analyzing interactive dynamics in the co-construction of a text's meaning _cby Christian Tarchi & Giuliana Pinto |
||
| 300 | _app. 518-530 | ||
| 336 | _atext | ||
| 337 | _aunmediated | ||
| 338 | _avolume | ||
| 440 |
_vvol. 109 n5 _x0022-0671 |
||
| 500 | _aReciprocal teaching is one of the most successfully implemented cooperative learning practices, yet many aspects of the process it follows are still unclear. The author's aim was two-fold: To analyze whether reciprocal teaching activities diversity in discourse moves, communicative functions, and interaction sequences; and to determine whether reciprocal teaching needs to be based on prior work on student collaboration and cooperation skills in order to be effective (context dependency vs. context independency). Two groups with a different instructional background were compared: one with a teacher-centered and one with a student-centered approach. Forty-three third-grade students were led through a reciprocal teaching reading activity. Video recordings of each group were transcribed and analyzed at the micro level. Frequencies for each category were described and interpreted. The two groups did not differ significantly in the processes followed, indicating that reciprocal teaching is context independent and able to create interaction-rich and diverse environment. | ||
| 600 | 0 |
_aPinto, Giuliana _911520 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aTeaching _94663 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aTeaching, Methods of _911521 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aCooperative education _911522 |
|
| 700 |
_aPinto, Giuliana _911520 |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cPINDEX |
||
| 999 |
_c8289 _d8289 |
||