<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Reciprocal teaching: Analyzing interactive dynamics in the co-construction of a text's meaning</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <titleInfo type="uniform">
    <title>The Journal of Educational Research</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Tarchi, Christian</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Pinto, Giuliana</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>pp. 518-530</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">by Christian Tarchi &amp; Giuliana Pinto</note>
  <note>Reciprocal teaching is one of the most successfully implemented cooperative learning practices, yet many aspects of the process it follows are still unclear. The author's aim was two-fold: To analyze whether reciprocal teaching activities diversity in discourse moves, communicative functions, and interaction sequences; and to determine whether reciprocal teaching needs to be based on prior work on student collaboration and cooperation skills in order to be effective (context dependency vs. context independency). Two groups with a different instructional background were compared: one with a teacher-centered and one with a student-centered approach. Forty-three third-grade students were led through a reciprocal teaching reading activity. Video recordings of each group were transcribed and analyzed at the micro level. Frequencies for each category were described and interpreted. The two groups did not differ significantly in the processes followed, indicating that reciprocal teaching is context independent and able to create interaction-rich and diverse environment. 


</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <name type="personal">
      <namePart>Pinto, Giuliana</namePart>
    </name>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Teaching</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Teaching, Methods of</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Cooperative education</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc">Per/371.102/T179/2016</classification>
  <relatedItem type="series">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>vol. 109 n5</title>
    </titleInfo>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="issn">0022-0671</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg"/>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">240918</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20240918135209.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
