<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Measuring and comparing academic language development and conceptual understanding via science notebooks</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <titleInfo type="uniform">
    <title>The Journal of Educational Research</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Huerta, Margarita</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Tong, Fuhui</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Lara-Alecio, Rafael</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Irby, Beverly J.</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>pp. 503-517</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">by Margarita Huerta, Fuhui Tong, Beverly J. Irby and Rafael Lara-Alecio</note>
  <note>The authors of his quantitative study measured and compared the academic language development and conceptual understanding of fifth-grade economically disadvantaged English language learners (ELL), former ELLs, and native English-speaking (ES) students as reflected in their science notebook scores. Using an instrument they developed, the authors quantified the student notebook language and concept scores. They compared language growth over time across three time points: beginning, middle, and end of the school year and across language-status (ELL, former ELL, and ES), and gender using mixed between -within subjects analysis of variance (ANOVA). The authors also compared students' conceptual understanding scores across categories in three domains using ANOVA. Students demonstrated statistically significant growth over time in their academic language as reflected by science notebook scores, and we noticed conceptual trends in which scores for ELLs, former ELLs, and male students lagged behind at first, but caught up to their peers by the end of the school year.</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Education-curriculum</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Science</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Science-Study and teaching</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc">Per/375/H887/2016</classification>
  <relatedItem type="series">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>vol. 109 n5</title>
    </titleInfo>
  </relatedItem>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg"/>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">240905</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20250625142434.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
